Techniques for permaculture practitioners…
ORID: how strategic questioning that gets you to a decision
WE ALL KNOW the scenario: you have been called to a meeting and now you sit there, increasingly bored as the discussion wanders all over the place, becoming sidetracked and dominated by the loud and verbose. When it comes time to make a decision you find that nobody is ready because the wayward discussion has confused, misled and obfuscated the issue and that there is too little information.
Sound familiar? We’ve all been to unfocused, time wasting meetings like this. But — it doesn’t have to be this way.
ORID is strategic questioning, a structured conversation
The ORID (Objective, Reflective, Interpretive, Decisional) method is a form of a structured conversation led by a facilitator.
The method was developed by the Institute for Cultural Affairs as a means to analyse facts and feelings, to ask about implications and to make decisions intelligently. It is a means of escaping the morass of maniacal meetings.
When done by a facilitator with some experience in the use of the method, participants are often unaware that they are taking part in a structured conversation. It is as if someone has sat down with the group and started an informal discussion.
Essentially a tool for making decisions, ORID can be used by:
- sustainability educators, to engage an audience in deliberation or to recap what was covered in a previous meeting or class
- community organisations, businesses, government and by just about any group seeking a decision
- by educators to explore decisions in class
- in one-to-one conversations to clarify a path of action for an individual; this provides ORID with a potential role in personal problem solving, counseling and community work
- journalists, who might use ORID to structure in-depth and investigatory interviews.
A structured process
A meeting that employs ORID is the antithesis of the rambling, unfocused structure we are all too used to. ORID creates a dynamic forward movement towards a point of decision.
Here’s how to use it…
First, the meeting agrees to make use of ORID and to abide by the process. It appoints a facilitator with experience in using the method. The meeting agrees that the facilitator can call the meeting back to order when participants take the discussion into time wasting asides.
The facilitator takes the group through a series of questions which lead to a decision-making stage. For each of the questions, a scribe writes the main points on a blackboard.
The strategic questions
O — Objective questions
The O questions identify objective facts relevant to the topic. The key question is: what do we know about this?
If it is an event or occurrence that is the focus of the ORID, then the group recalls the event and distills facts from it.
The facilitator will have to be alert to pull people back from discussing what they think about the topic and their feelings about it at this stage — that comes next. All we want now are the facts. Beware of comments starting with ‘I think… ‘, ‘I feel’… ‘It’s my opinion…’.
What we want are statement starting with terms like ‘I saw…’, ‘I heard…’, ‘I know…’, ‘There is evidence for…’ ‘It’s on the record that…’. These are documented but not analysed.
R — Reflective questions
The R questions are about how people feel about the topic. They are about subjective perceptions. The key question is: how do we feel about this?
Feelings might be positive or apprehensive and might be emotional.
The R questions allow participants to express their gut feelings although these might have no objective facts to support them. Nonetheless, they are part of a comprehensive assessment of the topic in question and should not be ignored. Fears and concerns may come to the surface during this phase.
The phase is one of identifying feelings and not of analysing them.
I — Interpretive questions
These questions have to do with meaning. The key question of the interpretive stage is this: what does it mean for me/you/the organisation etc?
Basing discussion on information derived during the objective and reflective questioning, the discussion allows the topic to be put into perspective and for the potential impacts of the topic on the individual or organisation to be explored.
Interpretive questions might include ‘What if…?’ questions as well as ‘What would it mean… ?’, ‘What would that do… ?’ and so on.
This is the analyitical phase.
D — Decisional questions
Based on information coming from the three previous stages of questioning, this is the stage at which a decision is produced. The key question at the decisional stage is: What are we going to do?
The facilitator might set set scene for this critical question by recapping the findings of the previous three stages.
The focus of discussion in the decisional stage is the future. What would be the best course of action? What would be achievable, positive outcomes? What is realistic given the limitation of our resources?
A few needs
In all four sages, the phrasing of the questions and statements by the facilitator are critical to the maintenance of focused discussion.
It is important to set aside sufficient, uninterrupted time for the ORID process. Rushed conversations and frequent interruptions cut off important discussion and are distracting. There is no fixed time over which to run an ORID process. It can be made comparatively short providing there is enough time to adequately cover all of the questions.
Facilitators and educators planning to make use of the ORID technique are advised to practice it with people they know before launching into an important decision making process.
More stories on Permaculture Journal…
Are permaculture courses too expensive?
I am republishing a story I wrote in a now-defunct website in the September of 2015 when questions about the cost of…
Your oil wake-up call
Guest writer, Dr Ted Trainer, has for decades been a limits to growth advocate. Ted lectured in limits to growth and…
The pandemic response: a new rift opens in permaculture
This story was stimulated by permaculture co-inventor, David Holmgren’s public statement about why he chooses to avoid…
A mildly hot find
I WAS IN the Permaculture Interpretive Garden in Randwick, in Sydney’s Eastern Suburbs one fine, mid-winter day. Emma…
Homesick — a woman’s search for livelihood and a home
A review of Catrina Davies’ book in which I highlight parallels with the Australian experience.
The housing crisis: time to adopt alternative solutions?
It is time to start treating Australia’s housing situation for what it is — a crisis. Rather than applying the same old…